Vínculos y documentos en línea

ALPIZAR, Francisco, NORDÉN, Anna, PFAFF, Alexander y ROBALINO, Juan. 2012. Behavioral Spillovers from Targeted Incentives: When do conditional payment programs affect those not selected for payment? Duke Environmental and Energy Economics Working Paper Series. Du, USA. Disponible en: doi:

http://sites.nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/environmentaleconomics/files/2014/01/WP-EE-13-07-Pfaff-et-al._full-pdf.pdf

ANYANGO – VAN ZWIETEN, Nowella, VAN DER DUIM, René y VISSEREN – HAMAKERS, Ingrid. 2015. Compensating for livestock killed by lions: payment for environmental services as a policy arrangement. Environmental Conservation, 42:4. Pág. 363 – 372. Disponible en:

doi: 10.1017/S0376892915000090

BALVANERA, Patricia., et al. 2012. Ecosystem services research in Latin America: The state of the art. Ecosystem Services, 2. Pág. 50 – 70. Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.006

BARR, Roha F. y MOURATO, Susuna. 2014. Investigating fishers’ preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes. Ecological Economics, 108. Pág. 91–103. Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.006

BORDA, Carlos Andrés, MORENO-SÁNCHEZ Rocío del Pilar, y WUNDER, Sven. 2010.  Pagos por Servicios Ambientales en Marcha: La Experiencia en la Microcuenca de Chaina, Departamento de Boyacá, Colombia. Centro para la Investigación Forestal Internacional (CIFOR). República de Colombia. Disponible en:

http://www.minambiente.gov.co/images/NegociosVerdesysostenible/pdf/pago_por_servicios_ambientales/Adjunto_2_CIFOR.Pagos_por_Servicios_Ambientales_en_Marcha_La_experiencia_en_la_Microcuenca_de_Chaina.pdf

CALLE, Zoraida, MURGUEITIO, et al. 2013. A Strategy for Scaling-Up Intensive Silvopastoral Systems in Colombia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. Pág. 677–693 Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2013.817338

DERISSEN, Sandra y LATACZ-LOHMANN, Uwe. 2013. What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension. Ecosystem Services, 6. Pág. 12–15. Disponible en:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230898943_What_are_PES_-A_review_of_definitions_and_an_extension

DI TRAPANI, Anna Maria, et al. 2014. Payment for environmental services for the sustainable development of the territory. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 10:5. Pág. 480-488. Disponible en:

doi: 10.3844/ajessp.2014.480.488 y http://thescipub.com/PDF/ajessp.2014.480.488.pdf

ENGEL, Stefanie, PAGIOLA, Stefano, y WUNDER, Sven. 2009. Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues. Ecological Economics,65(4). Pág. 663–674. Disponible en:

doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

FARLEY, Joshua y CONSTANZA, Robert. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics, 69. Pág. 2060–2068. Disponible en:

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010

FIGUEROA, Fernanda, et al. 2016.I like to conserve the forest, but I also like the cash. Socioeconomic factors influencing the motivation to be engaged in the Mexican Payment for Environmental Services Programme. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 22. Pág. 36–51. Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2015.11.002

FRIPP, Emily. 2014. Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): A practical guide to assessing the feasibility of PES projects. CIFOR. Bogor, Indonesia. Disponible en:

http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BFripp1401.pdf

GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN, Erik, et al. 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69. Pág. 1209–1218. Disponible en:

http://www.cepal.org/ilpes/noticias/paginas/7/40547/the_history_of_ecosystem.pdf

GRIMA, Nelson, SINGH, Simron, SMETSCHKA, Barbara, y RINGHOFER, Lisa. 2016. Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosystem Services, 17. Pág. 24–32, Disponible en:

doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.010

HAYES, Tanya, MURTINHO, Felipe y WOLFF, Hendrik. 2015. An institutional analysis of Payment for Environmental Services on collectively managed lands in Ecuador. Ecological Economics, 118. Pág. 81–89. Disponible en:

http://hendrikwolff.com/Selected%20Publications/Peer%20Refereed%20Articles/Ecuador.pdf

JOST, Fracois y GENTES, Ingo. 2014. Payment Schemes for Environmental Services: Challenges and pitfalls with respect to effectiveness, efficiency and equity” en Forest and rural development. Springer, Hamburgo. Disponible en:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262418303_Payment_Schemes_for_Environmental_Services_Challenges_and_Pitfalls_with_Respect_to_Effectiveness_Efficiency_and_Equity

KATOOMBA GROUP, FOREST TRENDS y UNEP. 2008. Payments for Ecosystem Services Getting Started: A Primer. Nairobi. Disponible en:

http://www.unep.org/pdf/PaymentsForEcosystemServices_en.pdf

KEMKES, Robin, FARLEY, Joshua y KOLBA, Christopher. 2010. Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecological Economics 69 (2010). Pág.  2069–2074. Disponible en:

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.032

KERR, John R. 2014. Incentives, conditionality and collective action in payment for environmental services. International Journal of the Commons, 8:2. Pág. 595–616. Disponible en:

doi: NBN:NL:UI:10-1-116428 y

https://www.thecommonsjournal.org/articles/10.18352/ijc.438/

KOLINJIVADI, Vijay, et al. 2015. Capabilities as justice: Analysing the acceptability of payments for ecosystem services (PES) through ‘social multi-criteria evaluation’. Ecological Economics, 118. Pág, 99–113. Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.008

KOSY, Nicolás y CORBERA, Steve. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics, 69. Pág. 1228–1236. Disponible en:

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002

KROEGER, Timm. 2013. The quest for the “optimal” payment for environmental services program: Ambition meets reality, with useful lessons. Forestry Policy and Economics, 37. Pág. 65–74. Disponible en:

doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.007

KRONENBERG, Jakub y HUBACEK, Klaus. 2013. Could payments for ecosystem services create an ‘ecosystem service curse. Ecology and Society, 18(1) 10. Disponible en:

http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss1/art10/

LIPPER, SAKUYAMA, STRINGER, ZIBERMAN [eds.]. 2009. Payment for environmental services in agricultural landscapes. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Springer, Roma. Disponible en:

http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/an456e/an456e00.pdf

MINISTERIO DE AMBIENTE Y DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE. 2012. Política Nacional para la Gestión Integral de la Biodiversidad y sus Servicios Ecosistémicos (PNGIBSE), Bogotá. Disponible en:

http://www.humboldt.org.co/images/pdf/PNGIBSE_espa%C3%B1ol_web.pdf

MORENO DÍAZ, Carlos Alberto, Línea base de las iniciativas de pago por servicios ambientales – PSA en Colombia, MADS – GIZ, 2013

MORENO, Pedro, H. 2016. Fondo agua por la vida y la sostenibilidad: valle geográfico del río Cauca. ASOCAÑA. Disponible en:

www.asocana.com.co/ documentos/2452011-f02f6949-00ff00,000a000,c3c3c3,0f0f0f,b4b4b4,ff00ff, 2d2d2d,b9b9b9.pdf

MURADIAN, Roldan, et al. 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69. Pág. 1202–1208 Disponible en:

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006

MURGUEITIO, Enrique, et al. 2011. Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. Forestry Ecology and Management, 261. Pág. 1654–1663. Disponible en:

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.027

REID, Colin T. y NSOH, Walters. 2016. The privatization of biodiversity?Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Cheltenham. Caps. 1 y 3. Disponible en:

doi: 10.4337/9781783474448

RODRÍGUEZ DE FRANCISCO, J.C. y BUDDS, J. 2015. Payments for environmental services and control over conservation of natural resources: The role of public and private sectors in the conservation of the Nima watershed, Colombia. Ecological Economics, 117. Pág. 295–302. Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.003

RUIZ-AGUDELO, César Augusto. 2014. ¿El valor de algunos servicios ecosistémicos de los Andes colombianos?: transferencia de beneficios por meta – análisis. Universitas Scientiarum, 19:3. Pág. 301-322. Disponible en: doi:

http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/scientarium/article/view/7413/7166

SATTER, Claudia y MATZDORF, Bettina. 2013. PES in a nutshell: From definitions and origins to PES in practice –  Approaches, design process and innovative aspects. Ecosystem Services, 6. Pág. 2–11. Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.009

SCHOMERS, Sarah y MATZDORF, Bettina. 2013. Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem Services, 6. Pág. 16–30. Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002

SMITH, S., ROWCROFT, P., et al. 2013. Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Best Practice Guide. DEFRA. Londres. Disponible en:

https://www.cbd.int/financial/pes/unitedkingdom-bestpractice.pdf

TENGBERG, Anna, et al. 2012. Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2. Pág. 14–26. Disponible en:

doi: dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006

WUNDER, Sven. 2015. Revisiting the concept of Payment for Environmental Services. Ecological Economics, 117 Pág. 234–243. Disponible en: doi: y

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270664350_Revisiting_the_concept_of_payments_for_environmental_services

WUNDER, Sven. 2006. Pagos por servicios ambientales: Principios esenciales. CIFOR, Occasional Paper No. 42(s). Jakarta. Disponible en:

http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-42S.pdf

footer-img-3